Files
SlipItIn/.github/skills/loop-architect/references/goal-rubric.md
Tim Krampitz 01046b01e4 Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert
Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
2026-07-26 14:00:58 +02:00

1.5 KiB

Goal Rubric

Use this when shaping the user's loop goal.

Good Goal Shape

  • Names the concrete outcome, not only the activity.
  • Defines the artifact or state that proves the loop finished.
  • Sets scope boundaries: included work, excluded work, and maximum depth.
  • Names context sources the host must gather instead of assumptions it may make.
  • Identifies the user, customer, system, or reviewer who will consume the result.

Critique Prompts

  • What would count as done if two competent agents disagreed?
  • Which terms are subjective and need a measurable proxy?
  • What context must be read before the host drafts a plan?
  • What is explicitly out of scope for this loop?
  • Can the goal be split into plan, delivery, and verification artifacts?

Anti-Patterns

  • "Improve the project" without a target artifact.
  • "Make it good" without criteria.
  • "Research X" without the decision the research supports.
  • Goals where success depends on information the loop never gathers.
  • Goals that require endless polishing with no stop condition.

Better Examples

Weak: "Make our onboarding better."

Better: "Produce a 5-step onboarding workflow map for new enterprise users, with each step assigned to a product surface, email, human owner, or missing capability, and with no unresolved TBDs."

Weak: "Fix the flaky tests."

Better: "Identify and patch the root cause of the checkout test flake, prove it with 20 local repeats or a CI rerun, and leave a short note explaining the failure mode and the verification evidence."