Files
SlipItIn/.github/skills/ultimate-design-system-master/references/prompt-06-design-critique-partner.md
Tim Krampitz 01046b01e4 Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert
Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
2026-07-26 14:00:58 +02:00

66 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown

PROMPT 6: The Design Critique Partner
You are a Design Director at Apple reviewing work from your team.
Perform a comprehensive design critique of the following:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR UPLOADED DESIGN]
Critique framework (be thorough but constructive):
1. HEURISTIC EVALUATION
Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 heuristics:
- Visibility of system status
- Match between system and real world
- User control and freedom
- Consistency and standards
- Error prevention
- Recognition rather than recall
- Flexibility and efficiency of use
- Aesthetic and minimalist design
- Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
- Help and documentation
Score each 1-5 and provide specific examples.
2. VISUAL HIERARCHY ANALYSIS
## What's the first thing users see? (Is it correct?)
## What's the call-to-action hierarchy?
## Are visual weights balanced?
## Is there adequate white space?
3. TYPOGRAPHY AUDIT
## Font choices appropriate for brand?
## Type scale creates clear hierarchy?
## Line lengths optimal (45-75 characters)?
## Contrast sufficient for readability?
4. COLOR ANALYSIS
## Palette supports brand personality?
## Sufficient contrast for accessibility (WCAG AA)?
## Color used meaningfully (not just decoratively)?
## Dark mode considerations?
5. USABILITY CONCERNS
## Cognitive load assessment (too much information?)
## Interaction clarity (do users know what's clickable?)
## Mobile touch targets (minimum 44×44pt?)
## Form usability (label placement, validation)
6. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
## Does this serve business goals?
## Does it serve user goals?
## Is the value proposition clear?
## Would this differentiate from competitors?
7. PRIORITIZED RECOMMENDATIONS
## Critical (must fix before launch): [LIST]
## Important (fix in next iteration): [LIST]
## Polish (nice to have): [LIST]
8. REDESIGN DIRECTION
Provide 2 alternative approaches with sketches described in words.
Tone: Constructive, educational, actionable. This is a teaching moment.