Files
SlipItIn/.github/skills/slop-eval/references/output-template.md
Tim Krampitz 01046b01e4 Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert
Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
2026-07-26 14:00:58 +02:00

131 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Output Template
Emit the Slop Report exactly in this structure (step 7 of the workflow),
in the user's language, keeping tell IDs/names in English.
```markdown
# Slop Report — {design/site name}
> Evaluated: {date}
> Target: {URL / path / screenshot description}
> Evidence channels: {code / screenshots / live URL} — unverifiable: {list or "none"}
> Brief provided: {yes — summarize / no}
> Evaluator: slop-eval v1.0.0
> Framework: [pols.dev anti-slop design law](https://pols.dev/slop.md)
## Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Slop Index** | **{100 overall}/100** |
| Overall score | {overall}/100 {(capped by: signature gate / absolute-rule gate)} |
| Grade | {AF} — {verdict from the grade scale} |
| Tells detected | {n} ({c} critical, {m} major, {k} minor) |
| Signature (Axis 7) | {score}/100 |
| Absolute rules | {p} pass · {f} fail · {u} unverifiable |
{One-paragraph verdict in plain words: what this design is, what sinks or
carries it. Lead with the single most consequential finding.}
## Scorecard
| # | Axis | Weight | Score | Tells (crit/maj/min) |
|---|------|--------|-------|----------------------|
| 1 | Color & Light | 2x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 2 | Typography & Copy | 2x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 3 | Components & Ornament | 1x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 4 | Layout & Composition | 2x | {n}/100 {(compounding cap)} | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 5 | Motion & Interaction | 1x | {n or NA}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 6 | Execution & Craft | 2x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 7 | Signature & Uniqueness | 3x | {n}/100 | — |
| 8 | Cohesion | 2x | {n}/100 | — |
## Detected tells
Ordered critical → major → minor. Every row cites evidence; a tell with no
citation does not appear.
| ID | Tell | Sev | Evidence |
|----|------|-----|----------|
| {M1} | {Invisible-content trap} | crit | {file:line, hex, font name, or screenshot region — concrete} |
| ... | | | |
{Tells excluded because the brief directed them, if any:}
| ID | Tell | Excluded because |
|----|------|------------------|
## Absolute rules
| # | Rule | Status | Evidence |
|---|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Content visible by default | {pass/FAIL/unverifiable} | {evidence} |
| 2 | Clear the cut | {…} | {…} |
| 3 | Parallel alignment | {…} | {…} |
| 4 | Real centering | {…} | {…} |
| 5 | Legible contrast | {…} | {…} |
| 6 | Controls work | {…} | {…} |
## Signature assessment (Axis 7)
| # | Element | Score | Justification |
|---|---------|-------|---------------|
| S1 | Signature artifact | {0/50/100} | {one line} |
| S2 | Atmosphere | {…} | {…} |
| S3 | Layered depth | {…} | {…} |
| S4 | Character display face | {…} | {…} |
| S5 | Bespoke silhouette | {…} | {…} |
| S6 | Treated nav | {…} | {…} |
| S7 | Real specificity | {…} | {…} |
## Cohesion assessment (Axis 8)
| # | Check | Score | Justification |
|---|-------|-------|---------------|
| H1 | One palette | {0/50/100} | {one line} |
| H2 | One type voice | {…} | {…} |
| H3 | One system | {…} | {…} |
| H4 | Composed from the brief | {…} | {…} |
## Prioritized fixes
35, ranked by weighted score impact — a missing signature (3x axis)
usually outranks any single tell. Each fix names the tell/element, cites
its evidence, and prescribes the premium version from the slop→premium
pairs table where one exists.
### 1. {fix}
**Evidence:** {citation} · **Impact:** {axis, est. delta}
**Do:** {specific prescription — the premium pair, not just "remove it"}
### 2. {fix}
...
## Grade scale
{copy the Grade scale table from SKILL.md}
---
*Generated by [slop-eval](https://github.com/fabricioctelles/skills) v1.0.0
against [the pols.dev anti-slop design law](https://pols.dev/slop.md).*
```
## Comparison mode
When evaluating two designs (or before/after), add a side-by-side axis
table. NA rows drop from each side's weighted math.
```markdown
## Comparison: {A} vs {B}
| # | Axis | {A} | {B} | Delta |
|---|------|-----|-----|-------|
| 1 | Color & Light | 40 | 85 | +45 |
| ... | | | | |
| **Overall** | | **38** | **74** | **+36** |
| **Slop Index** | | **62** | **26** | **36** |
```