Files
Tim Krampitz ffb017568b
Some checks failed
Build / build (push) Successful in 2m0s
OpenWiki Update / update (push) Has been cancelled
Move skills to .agent directory
2026-10-04 22:13:19 +02:00

35 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Audit Output Template
Deliver every audit run (landing page, pricing page, onboarding flow, cancellation flow,
features page) in this shape. A row may only enter the table once it passes the completion
criterion — named mechanism + cited principle + attached evidence.
## Header
> **Target:** <URL or flow name> · **Date:** <date>
> **ICP:** <buying criteria — trigger, pain, prior attempt, proof needed; not demographics>
> **Awareness level:** <Schwartz stage of the arriving traffic>
> **Verdict:** <one sentence — the single biggest revenue leak found>
If ICP or awareness level can't be stated, that **is** finding #1 — the debug order starts
there (ICP → awareness → proof → visual), never at the visual layer.
## Findings
Ordered by expected revenue impact, not by position on the page.
| # | Finding | Mechanism | Principle (reference file) | The move | Evidence |
|---|---------|-----------|----------------------------|----------|----------|
| 1 | Hero opens with the product category, not the visitor's pain | 5-second test | "Pass the 5-second test — lead with the problem" (conversion-and-landing-pages) | Rewrite the first line to the pain: "Your team loses 6 hours a week hunting for information" | Descriptive vs transformation-led LPs: 0.5% vs 3% across 30 Brazilian SaaS ([source](https://x.com/richardrx/status/2045154631974539650)) |
When a finding involves numbers (A/B sample size, churn→LTV, CAC per closed deal), paste the
actual `scripts/revenue_math.py` output into the Evidence cell — never an estimate.
## Close
- **Do first:** the top 1–3 moves, each with one line on why it outranks the rest.
- **Don't:** any tempting change the SKILL.md gotchas rule out (fabricated scarcity, LP rules
applied to content pages, review manipulation, underpowered tests…).
- Append the prescribed moves to the project's `rcd-log.md` (format in SKILL.md) so the next
engagement starts from what was already tried.