Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
8.4 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loop-architect | Design well-structured agent loops with best-practice coaching and cross-model review gates before you run them. Use when the user wants to design, build, or set up an agent loop, iterative agent workflow, self-review loop, LLM-as-judge loop, multi-model council, reviewer/judge gate, or goal-driven looping process. Guides goal refinement, typed verification criteria, reviewer/judge selection, privacy boundaries, termination guards, and observability, then emits a RUN_IN_SESSION.md handoff prompt plus portable loop.yaml, loop.resolved.json, LOOP.md, and run-loop.py. |
|
Loop Architect
A loop design coach for Kiro CLI. Interviews you, critiques your design against
built-in best-practice rubrics, wires in cross-model reviewers or judges, shows
the loop as an ASCII flow preview, and writes portable artifacts you can run
immediately with /goal or later with the Python runner.
Based on Looper by Kevin Simback, MIT License. Adapted for Kiro CLI by ft.ia.br.
Why This Exists
Kiro CLI ships /goal (autonomous loop with self-verification) and subagents
(parallel pipelines with review loops). These execute a loop. Loop Architect
helps you design one worth executing — with a coached goal, typed
verification, a cross-model gate, and explicit termination guards.
/goal |
Subagent pipeline | Loop Architect | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer | execution | execution | design (pre-flight) |
| Coaches your goal | no | no | yes |
| Typed verification | no | no | yes (programmatic / judge / human) |
| Reviewer model | same model | configurable | different model, by default |
| Portable artifact | no | no | loop.yaml + resolved spec |
| Runs the loop | yes | yes | yes, via handoff |
Workflow
-
Resolve the target path from the user. Default:
./loop-architect-output. If the target contains an existingloop.yaml, treat as edit/resume. -
Load the relevant rubric only when entering that stage:
- Goal stage:
references/goal-rubric.md - Verification stage:
references/verification-rubric.md - Council stage:
references/council-rubric.md - Control stage:
references/control-rubric.md - Model detection:
references/model-detection.md
- Goal stage:
-
Interview in seven stages: goal, verification, host model, council, gates/control, confirmation flow preview, emit/run option. In the control stage, cover execution boundary, isolation, no-progress signals, state, and run logging.
-
Critique each stage before accepting it. Prefer concrete alternatives over vague warnings. Push weak goals toward outcome, scope, context, and done state. Push weak verification toward programmatic checks first, then judge rubrics, then human signoff.
-
Keep reviewer and judge roles distinct. A reviewer writes notes. A judge returns a structured verdict.
revise_until_cleanmust name a judge member orhumanasverdict_source. -
Require multiple termination guards:
max_iterations, a revision cap on each gate, a no-progress stop, and either a budget cap or an explicit human stop point. -
Before any cross-vendor council member is selected, state what context will leave the user's machine, which CLI receives it, which redaction globs apply, and that both execution paths require first-send consent.
-
Show an ASCII flow preview and ask for confirmation before final emission.
-
Emit these files into the target:
loop.yamlloop.resolved.jsonLOOP.mdRUN_IN_SESSION.mdrun-loop.pyloop-workspace/README.md
-
After writing
loop.yaml, compile it:python3 ~/.kiro/skills/loop-architect/scripts/looper.py compile \ <target>/loop.yaml \ --out <target>/loop.resolved.json \ --render <target>/LOOP.md \ --session-prompt <target>/RUN_IN_SESSION.md -
Ask whether the user wants to run the loop now. If yes:
- Easy path: Follow
RUN_IN_SESSION.mddirectly, or suggest a/goalone-liner derived from thedefinition_of_done. - Subagent path: If the council uses a model with
review_loopcapability, offer to execute via a subagent pipeline with native review loops. - External path: Explain that
run-loop.pyis available for running later or outside the session.
- Easy path: Follow
Execution Paths
Path 1: /goal (simplest)
When the loop is straightforward and the host is the current Kiro session:
/goal --max 12 <definition_of_done from loop.yaml>
This uses Kiro's native self-verification loop. No cross-model review, but fast and zero-config.
Path 2: Subagent review pipeline (recommended)
When a cross-model reviewer is needed and the host has subagent capability:
Implement the loop following RUN_IN_SESSION.md. Use a subagent as reviewer
with trigger "NEEDS_CHANGES" and max 3 iterations per gate.
This leverages Kiro's native loop_to mechanism for the plan and delivery
gates.
Path 3: External Python runner (advanced)
python3 ./loop-architect-output/run-loop.py
For scheduled runs, CI integration, or when you need strict budget enforcement.
File Rules
- Write argv arrays, never shell command strings, for all model invocations.
- Do not write API keys, tokens, or credentials into any emitted file.
- Default redaction globs:
.env,.env.*,secrets/**,**/*.key. - Keep
loop.yamlhuman-readable and commented. - Keep
RUN_IN_SESSION.mdas the default/easy execution handoff. - Copy
templates/run-loop.pyexactly unless the user asks to edit it.
Helper Scripts
Detect model CLIs:
python3 ~/.kiro/skills/loop-architect/scripts/looper.py detect-models --write
Register a custom CLI:
python3 ~/.kiro/skills/loop-architect/scripts/looper.py register-model <id> \
--invoke kiro-cli chat --trust-all-tools -p --authed
Compile and render:
python3 ~/.kiro/skills/loop-architect/scripts/looper.py compile <target>/loop.yaml \
--out <target>/loop.resolved.json \
--render <target>/LOOP.md \
--session-prompt <target>/RUN_IN_SESSION.md
Confirmation Flow Preview
+--------------------------------+
| 1. Goal + context |
| read sources |
+--------------------------------+
|
v
+--------------------------------+
| 2. Draft plan.md |
| state -> state.json |
+--------------------------------+
|
v
+--------------------------------+
| 3. Plan gate |
| verdict: reviewer-1 |
+--------------------------------+
| needs work -> revise <= 3 -> step 2
| pass
v
+--------------------------------+
| 4. Write delivery-N.md |
| log -> run-log.md |
+--------------------------------+
|
v
+--------------------------------+
| 5. Delivery gate |
| verdict: reviewer-1 |
+--------------------------------+
| needs work -> revise <= 3 -> step 4
| pass
v
+--------------------------------+
| 6. Final output |
| all gates clean |
+--------------------------------+
Stops: pass gates | max 12 iterations | no progress x2 | budget 30m, $5.0
Emit Checklist
- The goal has a clear outcome, scope boundary, context sources, and done state.
- Verification criteria are typed as
programmatic,judge, orhuman. - At least one criterion is not purely vibe-based.
- Each
revise_until_cleangate has a validverdict_source. - Every external invocation is an argv array with a timeout.
- Cross-vendor egress is scoped, redacted, and consent-gated.
loop_controlhas iteration, revision, no-progress, and budget caps.- Execution boundary and isolation are explicit.
- Observability names a
run-log.mdandstate.jsonpath. - Compiled artifacts (
loop.resolved.json,LOOP.md,RUN_IN_SESSION.md) pass validation before handoff.