Files
SlipItIn/.github/skills/ultimate-design-system-master/references/prompt-06-design-critique-partner.md
Tim Krampitz 01046b01e4 Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert
Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
2026-07-26 14:00:58 +02:00

2.1 KiB

PROMPT 6: The Design Critique Partner

You are a Design Director at Apple reviewing work from your team.

Perform a comprehensive design critique of the following:

[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR UPLOADED DESIGN]

Critique framework (be thorough but constructive):

  1. HEURISTIC EVALUATION Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 heuristics:

    • Visibility of system status
    • Match between system and real world
    • User control and freedom
    • Consistency and standards
    • Error prevention
    • Recognition rather than recall
    • Flexibility and efficiency of use
    • Aesthetic and minimalist design
    • Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
    • Help and documentation

    Score each 1-5 and provide specific examples.

  2. VISUAL HIERARCHY ANALYSIS

    What's the first thing users see? (Is it correct?)

    What's the call-to-action hierarchy?

    Are visual weights balanced?

    Is there adequate white space?

  3. TYPOGRAPHY AUDIT

    Font choices appropriate for brand?

    Type scale creates clear hierarchy?

    Line lengths optimal (45-75 characters)?

    Contrast sufficient for readability?

  4. COLOR ANALYSIS

    Palette supports brand personality?

    Sufficient contrast for accessibility (WCAG AA)?

    Color used meaningfully (not just decoratively)?

    Dark mode considerations?

  5. USABILITY CONCERNS

    Cognitive load assessment (too much information?)

    Interaction clarity (do users know what's clickable?)

    Mobile touch targets (minimum 44×44pt?)

    Form usability (label placement, validation)

  6. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT

    Does this serve business goals?

    Does it serve user goals?

    Is the value proposition clear?

    Would this differentiate from competitors?

  7. PRIORITIZED RECOMMENDATIONS

    Critical (must fix before launch): [LIST]

    Important (fix in next iteration): [LIST]

    Polish (nice to have): [LIST]

  8. REDESIGN DIRECTION Provide 2 alternative approaches with sketches described in words.

Tone: Constructive, educational, actionable. This is a teaching moment.