# Output Template

Emit the Slop Report exactly in this structure (step 7 of the workflow),
in the user's language, keeping tell IDs/names in English.

```markdown
# Slop Report — {design/site name}

> Evaluated: {date}
> Target: {URL / path / screenshot description}
> Evidence channels: {code / screenshots / live URL} — unverifiable: {list or "none"}
> Brief provided: {yes — summarize / no}
> Evaluator: slop-eval v1.0.0
> Framework: [pols.dev anti-slop design law](https://pols.dev/slop.md)

## Summary

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Slop Index** | **{100 − overall}/100** |
| Overall score | {overall}/100 {(capped by: signature gate / absolute-rule gate)} |
| Grade | {A–F} — {verdict from the grade scale} |
| Tells detected | {n} ({c} critical, {m} major, {k} minor) |
| Signature (Axis 7) | {score}/100 |
| Absolute rules | {p} pass · {f} fail · {u} unverifiable |

{One-paragraph verdict in plain words: what this design is, what sinks or
carries it. Lead with the single most consequential finding.}

## Scorecard

| # | Axis | Weight | Score | Tells (crit/maj/min) |
|---|------|--------|-------|----------------------|
| 1 | Color & Light | 2x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 2 | Typography & Copy | 2x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 3 | Components & Ornament | 1x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 4 | Layout & Composition | 2x | {n}/100 {(compounding cap)} | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 5 | Motion & Interaction | 1x | {n or NA}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 6 | Execution & Craft | 2x | {n}/100 | {c}/{m}/{k} |
| 7 | Signature & Uniqueness | 3x | {n}/100 | — |
| 8 | Cohesion | 2x | {n}/100 | — |

## Detected tells

Ordered critical → major → minor. Every row cites evidence; a tell with no
citation does not appear.

| ID | Tell | Sev | Evidence |
|----|------|-----|----------|
| {M1} | {Invisible-content trap} | crit | {file:line, hex, font name, or screenshot region — concrete} |
| ... | | | |

{Tells excluded because the brief directed them, if any:}
| ID | Tell | Excluded because |
|----|------|------------------|

## Absolute rules

| # | Rule | Status | Evidence |
|---|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Content visible by default | {pass/FAIL/unverifiable} | {evidence} |
| 2 | Clear the cut | {…} | {…} |
| 3 | Parallel alignment | {…} | {…} |
| 4 | Real centering | {…} | {…} |
| 5 | Legible contrast | {…} | {…} |
| 6 | Controls work | {…} | {…} |

## Signature assessment (Axis 7)

| # | Element | Score | Justification |
|---|---------|-------|---------------|
| S1 | Signature artifact | {0/50/100} | {one line} |
| S2 | Atmosphere | {…} | {…} |
| S3 | Layered depth | {…} | {…} |
| S4 | Character display face | {…} | {…} |
| S5 | Bespoke silhouette | {…} | {…} |
| S6 | Treated nav | {…} | {…} |
| S7 | Real specificity | {…} | {…} |

## Cohesion assessment (Axis 8)

| # | Check | Score | Justification |
|---|-------|-------|---------------|
| H1 | One palette | {0/50/100} | {one line} |
| H2 | One type voice | {…} | {…} |
| H3 | One system | {…} | {…} |
| H4 | Composed from the brief | {…} | {…} |

## Prioritized fixes

3–5, ranked by weighted score impact — a missing signature (3x axis)
usually outranks any single tell. Each fix names the tell/element, cites
its evidence, and prescribes the premium version from the slop→premium
pairs table where one exists.

### 1. {fix}

**Evidence:** {citation} · **Impact:** {axis, est. delta}

**Do:** {specific prescription — the premium pair, not just "remove it"}

### 2. {fix}

...

## Grade scale

{copy the Grade scale table from SKILL.md}

---

*Generated by [slop-eval](https://github.com/fabricioctelles/skills) v1.0.0
against [the pols.dev anti-slop design law](https://pols.dev/slop.md).*
```

## Comparison mode

When evaluating two designs (or before/after), add a side-by-side axis
table. NA rows drop from each side's weighted math.

```markdown
## Comparison: {A} vs {B}

| # | Axis | {A} | {B} | Delta |
|---|------|-----|-----|-------|
| 1 | Color & Light | 40 | 85 | +45 |
| ... | | | | |
| **Overall** | | **38** | **74** | **+36** |
| **Slop Index** | | **62** | **26** | **−36** |
```