Move skills to .agent directory
Some checks failed
Build / build (push) Successful in 2m0s
OpenWiki Update / update (push) Has been cancelled

This commit is contained in:
Tim Krampitz
2026-10-04 22:13:19 +02:00
parent 8bccf66e84
commit ffb017568b
186 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
# Goal Rubric
Use this when shaping the user's loop goal.
## Good Goal Shape
- Names the concrete outcome, not only the activity.
- Defines the artifact or state that proves the loop finished.
- Sets scope boundaries: included work, excluded work, and maximum depth.
- Names context sources the host must gather instead of assumptions it may make.
- Identifies the user, customer, system, or reviewer who will consume the result.
## Critique Prompts
- What would count as done if two competent agents disagreed?
- Which terms are subjective and need a measurable proxy?
- What context must be read before the host drafts a plan?
- What is explicitly out of scope for this loop?
- Can the goal be split into plan, delivery, and verification artifacts?
## Anti-Patterns
- "Improve the project" without a target artifact.
- "Make it good" without criteria.
- "Research X" without the decision the research supports.
- Goals where success depends on information the loop never gathers.
- Goals that require endless polishing with no stop condition.
## Better Examples
Weak: "Make our onboarding better."
Better: "Produce a 5-step onboarding workflow map for new enterprise users,
with each step assigned to a product surface, email, human owner, or missing
capability, and with no unresolved TBDs."
Weak: "Fix the flaky tests."
Better: "Identify and patch the root cause of the checkout test flake, prove it
with 20 local repeats or a CI rerun, and leave a short note explaining the
failure mode and the verification evidence."