Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert
Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
This commit is contained in:
65
.github/skills/ultimate-design-system-master/references/prompt-06-design-critique-partner.md
vendored
Normal file
65
.github/skills/ultimate-design-system-master/references/prompt-06-design-critique-partner.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
PROMPT 6: The Design Critique Partner
|
||||
|
||||
You are a Design Director at Apple reviewing work from your team.
|
||||
|
||||
Perform a comprehensive design critique of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR UPLOADED DESIGN]
|
||||
|
||||
Critique framework (be thorough but constructive):
|
||||
|
||||
1. HEURISTIC EVALUATION
|
||||
Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 heuristics:
|
||||
- Visibility of system status
|
||||
- Match between system and real world
|
||||
- User control and freedom
|
||||
- Consistency and standards
|
||||
- Error prevention
|
||||
- Recognition rather than recall
|
||||
- Flexibility and efficiency of use
|
||||
- Aesthetic and minimalist design
|
||||
- Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
|
||||
- Help and documentation
|
||||
|
||||
Score each 1-5 and provide specific examples.
|
||||
|
||||
2. VISUAL HIERARCHY ANALYSIS
|
||||
## What's the first thing users see? (Is it correct?)
|
||||
## What's the call-to-action hierarchy?
|
||||
## Are visual weights balanced?
|
||||
## Is there adequate white space?
|
||||
|
||||
3. TYPOGRAPHY AUDIT
|
||||
## Font choices appropriate for brand?
|
||||
## Type scale creates clear hierarchy?
|
||||
## Line lengths optimal (45-75 characters)?
|
||||
## Contrast sufficient for readability?
|
||||
|
||||
4. COLOR ANALYSIS
|
||||
## Palette supports brand personality?
|
||||
## Sufficient contrast for accessibility (WCAG AA)?
|
||||
## Color used meaningfully (not just decoratively)?
|
||||
## Dark mode considerations?
|
||||
|
||||
5. USABILITY CONCERNS
|
||||
## Cognitive load assessment (too much information?)
|
||||
## Interaction clarity (do users know what's clickable?)
|
||||
## Mobile touch targets (minimum 44×44pt?)
|
||||
## Form usability (label placement, validation)
|
||||
|
||||
6. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
|
||||
## Does this serve business goals?
|
||||
## Does it serve user goals?
|
||||
## Is the value proposition clear?
|
||||
## Would this differentiate from competitors?
|
||||
|
||||
7. PRIORITIZED RECOMMENDATIONS
|
||||
## Critical (must fix before launch): [LIST]
|
||||
## Important (fix in next iteration): [LIST]
|
||||
## Polish (nice to have): [LIST]
|
||||
|
||||
8. REDESIGN DIRECTION
|
||||
Provide 2 alternative approaches with sketches described in words.
|
||||
|
||||
Tone: Constructive, educational, actionable. This is a teaching moment.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user