Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert

Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.

.github/skills/revenue-centric-design/references/metrics-and-experimentation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Metrics, Experimentation & Business Math
+
+> Curated, distilled wisdom from @richardrx ("Richard — Design for startups"), translated from Portuguese. Each entry is a reusable principle linked to its source post.
+
+## Don't mistake signups for traction
+**Principle.** Signups are the cheapest action a user takes, so they measure curiosity, not value — especially in freemium. Real growth is whether people come back and do the action that delivers value.
+**Apply when.** A rising signup curve on the dashboard feels like proof of traction, particularly under a freemium model.
+**The move.** Treat signups as top-of-funnel only — never stop reading there. Track who returns on day 2 and day 7 (D1/D7 retention) and how many complete the value-delivering action (activation). Paid media can inflate signups while real retention stays flat.
+**Voice.** "The signup curve climbs with paid traffic, but usage and activation only climb with a good product."
+**Source.** [@richardrx · 2026-06-11](https://x.com/richardrx/status/2065082771987394651)
+
+## Don't bet your product on an underpowered A/B test
+**Principle.** Most A/B tests in small SaaS lack the volume to prove anything, yet founders swap the whole product on the result. Testing without enough sample to conclude is the trap.
+**Apply when.** You're in traction or survival stage, ran a test for a week, saw "variant B won by 12%," and want to ship it everywhere.
+**The move.** Before running, compute the minimum sample size (free calculators exist); if you can't hit that floor in reasonable time, don't start. Test big things (headline, offer, pricing structure, onboarding) since large effects need less sample. Never stop a test because the number looked pretty mid-way. With no volume, decide by qualitative research — five good interviews beat an underpowered A/B test. Beware the law of small numbers and confirmation bias.
+**Evidence.** ProfitWell is categorical: don't A/B test price — you'll never have the volume or context for it to mean anything.
+**Source.** [@richardrx · 2026-06-01](https://x.com/richardrx/status/2061463480868229189)
+
+## Celebrate signal quality, not list size
+**Principle.** A waitlist exists to validate that a pain is one people pay to solve — not to sell. Absolute size is a vanity metric; conversion-weighted quality is the real signal.
+**Apply when.** You launch a waitlist and feel tempted to celebrate raw headcount.
+**The move.** Convert size to expected customers before reacting: a good waitlist converts 15–20% to paying, above 30% is excellent. 53 people at 20% = 10 customers; 1,000 people at 1% = 10 customers — same result, different perception. Until there's a transaction, there's no validated hypothesis.
+**Voice.** "Founders celebrate the size of the list when they should celebrate the quality of the signal."
+**Source.** [@richardrx · 2026-04-17](https://x.com/richardrx/status/2045094511106220220)
+
+## Translate churn points into LTV, not percentages
+**Principle.** Most people watch churn %, but few compute what each point costs in accumulated LTV over 12 months. Cutting churn is a cash lever that needs no price hike or new acquisition.
+**Apply when.** You're staring at a churn percentage and treating it as a vanity number rather than money.
+**The move.** Do the churn→LTV math: at 25% monthly churn on 1,000 users you must add 250 new users/month just to break even — kill paid traffic and the product dies in ~4 months. Then improve retention without Figma: define the Aha Moment, measure time-to-value (TTV) from signup to it, ask "how do I deliver this faster?", break it into micro-wins if you can't, then test, measure, repeat.
+**Evidence.** Finance SaaS, ARPU R$120: cutting churn 5 points (25%→20%) is +R$72,000/year in cash, with no price change and no extra acquisition.
+**Source.** [@richardrx · 2026-04-06](https://x.com/richardrx/status/2041184077106004289)