Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert

Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.

.github/skills/loop-architect/references/verification-rubric.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Verification Rubric
+
+Use this when converting the user's definition of done into typed criteria.
+
+## Taxonomy
+
+`programmatic`
+: A command or deterministic check returns pass/fail. Use this whenever
+possible. Examples: tests, build, lint, schema validation, snapshot comparison,
+or an extraction script that checks required headings.
+
+`judge`
+: A model scores a rubric and returns a structured verdict. Use this for
+semantic quality that cannot be cheaply checked by code. The rubric must be
+specific enough that a different model can apply it consistently.
+
+`human`
+: A person must sign off. Use this for taste, business judgment, private
+knowledge, legal risk, or decisions where the user is the true authority.
+
+## Required Fields
+
+- Every criterion needs `id` and `type`.
+- `programmatic` needs `check` as an argv array and `expect`.
+- `judge` needs `rubric`.
+- `human` needs `prompt`.
+
+## Strong Criteria
+
+- Check one thing at a time.
+- Say what failure means.
+- Prefer deterministic checks before model judgment.
+- Make judge rubrics observable against artifacts the judge receives.
+- Avoid relying on the host model to grade its own work.
+
+## Anti-Patterns
+
+- All criteria are judge or human criteria when tests or schema checks exist.
+- "No errors thrown" as the only success criterion.
+- Criteria that require hidden context not sent to the judge.
+- Rubrics like "high quality" or "comprehensive" without dimensions.
+- Programmatic checks written as shell strings instead of argv arrays.
+
+## Structured Judge Contract
+
+Judges should return a fenced JSON object:
+
+```json
+{
+  "verdict": "pass",
+  "blocking_issues": [],
+  "confidence": 0.86,
+  "notes": "The artifact satisfies the rubric."
+}
+```
+
+Valid verdicts are `pass` and `revise`. If output cannot be parsed, the runner
+will treat it as `revise` with a warning.
+