Neue Skills, Referenzen & OpenWiki-Doku integriert
Umfangreiche Erweiterung der Skill-Bibliothek: Neue Skills für Humanisierung (Englisch/PT-BR), Design-Validierung, AI-SEO und Coolify-Deployment inkl. Regelwerke, Presets, Pattern-Referenzen, Testfälle und Automatisierungsskripte. Zusätzliche Skills für Revenue-Centric Design, Pier Cloud, OKF, Lebenslauf- und LinkedIn-Optimierung sowie zahlreiche Referenzdateien, Checklisten und YAML/JSON/Markdown-Templates. Einführung einer vollständigen OpenWiki-Dokumentation mit Architektur-, Domain- und Workflow-Beschreibungen, zentralem Index und automatisierten Updates. Modularer Aufbau, restriktive Lizenzen und umfassende Qualitäts- und Evaluationsmechanismen für alle neuen Inhalte.
This commit is contained in:
42
.github/skills/loop-architect/references/goal-rubric.md
vendored
Normal file
42
.github/skills/loop-architect/references/goal-rubric.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
# Goal Rubric
|
||||
|
||||
Use this when shaping the user's loop goal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Good Goal Shape
|
||||
|
||||
- Names the concrete outcome, not only the activity.
|
||||
- Defines the artifact or state that proves the loop finished.
|
||||
- Sets scope boundaries: included work, excluded work, and maximum depth.
|
||||
- Names context sources the host must gather instead of assumptions it may make.
|
||||
- Identifies the user, customer, system, or reviewer who will consume the result.
|
||||
|
||||
## Critique Prompts
|
||||
|
||||
- What would count as done if two competent agents disagreed?
|
||||
- Which terms are subjective and need a measurable proxy?
|
||||
- What context must be read before the host drafts a plan?
|
||||
- What is explicitly out of scope for this loop?
|
||||
- Can the goal be split into plan, delivery, and verification artifacts?
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
- "Improve the project" without a target artifact.
|
||||
- "Make it good" without criteria.
|
||||
- "Research X" without the decision the research supports.
|
||||
- Goals where success depends on information the loop never gathers.
|
||||
- Goals that require endless polishing with no stop condition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Better Examples
|
||||
|
||||
Weak: "Make our onboarding better."
|
||||
|
||||
Better: "Produce a 5-step onboarding workflow map for new enterprise users,
|
||||
with each step assigned to a product surface, email, human owner, or missing
|
||||
capability, and with no unresolved TBDs."
|
||||
|
||||
Weak: "Fix the flaky tests."
|
||||
|
||||
Better: "Identify and patch the root cause of the checkout test flake, prove it
|
||||
with 20 local repeats or a CI rerun, and leave a short note explaining the
|
||||
failure mode and the verification evidence."
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user